The difference between 800, 888, 877 and 866

There are four toll free area codes, 800, 888, 877 & 866.  Technically they all work the same.  However in terms of their marketing image and results for the advertisers, there are obviously some differences. 

The simple explanation is that 800 is essentially .com, 888 is .net and 866 and 877 are like .info, .biz or country codes.  They all technically work the same, but from a marketing standpoint 800 is the king.  800, or 1-800 is more than just a toll free area code but it’s a brand name.  That’s the real difference between 800 and 888 at this point, just the “brand name” value.  It’s the industry default that the one the biggest advertisers use. 

888 is understood and is has some uniquenes to it.  There’s no 777 or 999 and it’s able to be remembered as one string.  For all but the largest advertisers or the ones that rely heavily on credibility, it’s often an acceptable alternative, just like the .net in domain names.

 866 & 877 are like .info or .biz in that even though they technically work the same, they give a smaller home based or newer type of image.  They look more like regular area codes and you definitely have to reinforce that they’re toll free.  You may also lose some callers who think toll free and wind up calling the 800 version.

“800″ is the original toll free area code and has had billions of dollars in advertising and become so wide spread and accepted that the term “800 numbers” is basically a generic term for all area codes of toll free numbers.  By the way, that’s also why 800 is the only area code we usually put a 1 in front of.

888 numbers were introduced in 1996 after several months of rationing. 888 is intrinsically good and memorable and has some uniqueness since there is no 777 or 999 area code. There has also been a fair amount of use, particularly with companies that couldn’t get a good 800 number because of the way they were issued. So although the biggest companies still tend to use 800, 888s are extremely popular and recognized as toll free.

877 was introduced in 1998, and 866 numbers were later added in 1999. They functions exactly as 800 and 888 numbers do, and although they work exactly the same, as “800″ and “888″ numbers, they don’t have the same marketing power. First of all, 877 and 866 look like any other new area codes and have no intrinsic numerical significance or memorability. Secondly, they don’t have the same amount of public use. Both 877 and 866 had only a fraction of the promotion that 888′s did at their introduction and they simply haven’t had the volume of public use that 888 had, even at the same stage in it’s life. Additional area codes such as 866 have also added to the confusion.

866 and 877 have their place, but that’s generally more for personal non-business or smaller business uses because they get fewer wrong numbers. If the calls are revenue generating and you are spending money in advertising to generate the calls, 866 or 877 numbers will cost you money. Just as it is harder to build a brand name around a country code domain name. They may technically function the same as .com, but they don’t generate the same results in marketing. The same is true with 800 numbers.

800 is the .com. It’s the default and the one that the big money and fortune 500 companies have used and will continue to use. 888 is the equivalent of .net. It has some uniqueness and is somewhat memorable. It’s seen and understood by most as an alternative. The main difference between .com and .net is the brand name, and the same is true for 800 and 888. You’ll still lose some calls to the 800 version, especially for applications which involve spontaneous recall or require the caller to dial from memory but at least it gives you an alternative. That doesn’t mean though, that if you can’t get the first 800 you wanted, that your second choice should automatically be the 888 version of this number.

You also have to realize that you have to not only know what you want, but you also have to take what you can get too.  The more advertising you do, the more you need a better number, and the less advertising you do, the less you need a “brand name” 800 number.  If you’re small and just starting out, you already know you can’t afford the best of everything, and that’s probably true with your toll free number too.

16 thoughts on “The difference between 800, 888, 877 and 866”

  1. Hi Adam,

    There’s no absolute answer to your question of area code or terms. Overall I usually say that what you say matters more than the voice you say it in, but it’s definitely a judgment call. The more advertising you’re doing and the more you’re aiming for a fortune 500 big company image the more important it is to have the ‘800’. This is even more important for an elderly audience or situation where credibility is a key factor in the sale.

    But overall the most important thing in your advertising in general as well as the toll free number, is the message. Many people confuse a generic term related to your business as the message though. Your message is essentially the point of your advertising. And if the point of your advertising is that you’re in X business then you’re never going to get past “Me To” marketing and stand out. Find a creative slogan and stand out.


  2. Bill,

    Sorry to bring back a relatively old post alive. I’m looking to get a toll free number for our company.
    Would you recommend we get a vanity 866 or 877 number, or an obscure 800 number?

    In our business, the remembering of the number is not THAT important, most people who’ll call will be calling us by looking up our number through our website or our business cards, not a billboard or a tv/radio advert.

    1. That’s exactly when remembering your number is MOST important, when people have to go look it up. It’s dialing right there while they are looking at an ad that the more “memorable” vanity number matters less. Its when they have to go look for it that it matters most.

    2. There’s no one answer to this. If you can get a number with the right message, I find that the message or body of the number is more important than the area code in most things. But when it’s in print it matters less than a broadcast type of advertising I agree. Numbers also have an advantage in Foreign Language speaking audiences, Elderly audiences, and repeat calling situations. Other situations would lean toward the vanity number. But if you’re evaluating a bad vanity number that really doesn’t flow and has extra stuff in it, digits or too many words etc, a True “800″ number can give credibility too. So if it’s a sale that requires credibility and you don’t have any good vanity options, sometimes an “800″ is better than a really bad vanity.

  3. Great analogy! We’re getting one for our business and we can’t see to get 800 or 888 number. Oh well!:(

  4. Are there any conditions in which a 877 number is not Toll Free? I have recently been billed for calls involving an 877 number which I thought should have been Toll Free.

  5. The definition of a Toll Free Number is that it’s free to the caller and the receiving party pays for the cost of the call. Unless you were purchasing something else, which is common and why many businesses use toll free numbers, an 877 call is always free to the caller and the receiving party pays for the cost of making the call.

  6. Question: For truck signage do you recommend using a 1 in front of the 800 or just have 800-XXX-XXXX?

    This is for a truck that does regional deliveries.

  7. For “800″s I’d put a 1 in front. Not because people don’t know but because that’s a BRAND NAME. I wouldn’t for other area codes, although for 844 and 855 I’d put “Toll Free” in front of the number if it fit.

  8. Whats the difference between 1866 and without adding the prefix 866?
    Will it route to different company?
    Its happening in my case. If you dont add prefix 1, its getting redirected to another support.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>